"Beef. It's What's for Dinner."
"Pork. The Other White Meat."
"Got Milk?"
You've heard these campaigns. You probably didn't know they were funded by farmers.
These iconic taglines came from checkoff programs—industry-funded marketing initiatives that have shaped how Americans think about agricultural commodities for decades. Checkoff programs represent one of the most powerful yet least understood mechanisms in agricultural marketing.
This guide explains how checkoff programs work, where the money goes, and why they matter for commodity boards, producers, and the broader agricultural economy.
What is a Checkoff Program?
A checkoff program is a producer-funded marketing and research initiative for agricultural commodities. Producers pay a small assessment—typically a fixed amount per unit sold—into a collective fund. That fund supports marketing campaigns, consumer research, export promotion, and product development for the entire commodity category.
The term "checkoff" comes from the mechanism: producers "check off" a portion of their sales proceeds at the point of transaction. The funds flow to commodity boards or councils that manage programs on behalf of the industry.
Think of it as collective marketing. Individual beef producers can't afford national advertising campaigns. But when every producer contributes a small amount per head sold, the industry can fund campaigns that reach millions of consumers.
How Checkoff Programs Work
The Assessment
Producers pay a mandatory or voluntary assessment based on their sales. For example:
-
•
Beef: $1 per head sold
-
•
Pork: $0.40 per $100 of value
-
•
Soybeans: 0.5% of net market price
-
•
Dairy: $0.15 per hundredweight of milk
These assessments are collected at the point of sale—typically by the first purchaser (a packer, processor, or handler)—and remitted to the appropriate commodity board.
The Oversight
Most checkoff programs operate under federal authority through the USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). The USDA:
-
•
Conducts referendums to establish or continue programs
-
•
Approves board appointments
-
•
Reviews budgets and programs
-
•
Ensures compliance with enabling legislation
State programs may operate independently or in coordination with federal programs.
The Governance
Producer-elected boards govern checkoff programs. Board members are typically nominated by producer organizations and appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture. They set priorities, approve budgets, and oversee program execution.
Major U.S. Checkoff Programs
The USDA oversees 22 research and promotion programs. Here are some of the largest:
State-level programs add to these totals. Combined, U.S. checkoff programs generate hundreds of millions annually for commodity promotion.
Where Checkoff Dollars Go
Checkoff funds support four primary areas:
1. Consumer Marketing and Advertising
The most visible use of checkoff funds. National campaigns like "Beef. It's What's for Dinner" and "The Incredible, Edible Egg" build consumer awareness and preference. These campaigns:
-
•
Run television, digital, and print advertising
-
•
Create recipe content and meal inspiration
-
•
Partner with influencers and culinary professionals
-
•
Sponsor events and cultural moments
2. Research and Product Development
Checkoff programs fund research to:
-
•
Improve production efficiency
-
•
Develop new products and applications
-
•
Study nutritional benefits
-
•
Address consumer concerns (sustainability, animal welfare)
For example, the pork checkoff funded research that led to leaner pork products, supporting the "Other White Meat" positioning.
3. Export Promotion
Many checkoff programs invest in international market development:
-
•
Trade missions and buyer education
-
•
In-market promotions in target countries
-
•
Partnerships with USDA Foreign Agricultural Service
-
•
Consumer research in export markets
The beef checkoff, for instance, supports export promotion in Japan, South Korea, and other key markets.
4. Industry Relations and Education
Checkoff funds also support:
-
•
Producer education and communication
-
•
Foodservice and retail partnerships
-
•
Nutrition education for health professionals
-
•
Crisis communication and issue management
The Case For Checkoff Programs
Proponents argue checkoff programs deliver significant returns:
Collective Action Solves a Real Problem
Individual producers can't fund national marketing. A single corn farmer has no way to build consumer demand alone. Checkoff programs pool resources to achieve what no individual could accomplish.
Documented ROI
Studies consistently show positive returns on checkoff investments. The beef checkoff has reported returns of $11.20 for every dollar invested. The soybean checkoff claims $12.34 per dollar. Even accounting for methodological debates, the evidence suggests checkoff programs increase demand.
Brand Building for Commodities
Commodities compete not against each other but against consumer indifference. Checkoff programs build category awareness and relevance, keeping commodities top-of-mind in an era of endless food choices.
Export Market Development
Checkoff-funded export promotion opens and expands international markets. For commodities with mature domestic demand, export growth often represents the best opportunity for increased returns.
The Case Against Checkoff Programs
Critics raise legitimate concerns:
Mandatory Participation
Producers must pay assessments regardless of whether they support program priorities. Some view this as compelled speech—forcing producers to fund messages they may disagree with.
This issue reached the Supreme Court in Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association (2005), which ruled that checkoff-funded speech is government speech and therefore not subject to First Amendment challenges. The debate continues.
Governance Questions
Some producers feel disconnected from board decisions. Large operations may have disproportionate influence. Program priorities don't always align with all producers' interests.
Effectiveness Debates
While ROI studies show positive returns, methodology varies. Critics question whether checkoff advertising truly drives incremental demand or simply takes credit for consumption that would have occurred anyway.
Consolidation Concerns
As agricultural production consolidates, checkoff assessments increasingly flow from fewer, larger operations. Some question whether programs designed for fragmented industries still serve consolidated ones.
How Checkoff Programs Have Evolved
Early checkoff programs focused primarily on domestic consumer advertising. Today's programs are more sophisticated:
From Awareness to Behavior
Modern checkoff programs emphasize behavioral insight—understanding not just what consumers say but what they do. The gap between stated preferences and actual behavior (the "say-do gap") has become central to program strategy.
Digital Transformation
Checkoff programs now invest heavily in digital content, social media, and influencer partnerships. Recipe videos, meal planning apps, and targeted digital advertising complement traditional media.
Research Integration
Leading programs integrate consumer research throughout strategy development, not just for campaign evaluation. Real-time insight enables faster response to market shifts.
Export Focus
With domestic markets mature for many commodities, export promotion has grown. Checkoff programs increasingly invest in understanding international consumers and building demand abroad.
Checkoff Programs and Consumer Research
Consumer research has become essential to effective checkoff programming. Boards need to understand:
-
•
Who's buying (and who isn't): Demographic shifts, generational differences, cultural factors
-
•
What drives choice: Price sensitivity, health perceptions, sustainability concerns
-
•
Where behavior happens: Retail vs. foodservice, regional variation, channel shifts
-
•
How to reach them: Media consumption, trusted sources, message resonance
Traditional research methods—surveys, focus groups, panels—remain valuable but face challenges:
-
•
Speed: Markets move faster than traditional research timelines
-
•
Cost: Comprehensive studies strain limited budgets
-
•
Bias: Respondents often say what they think researchers want to hear
-
•
Access: Hard-to-reach populations (international consumers, specific demographics) require specialized approaches
Emerging approaches like AI-powered synthetic research offer alternatives—providing consumer insight at the speed checkoff programs need, without traditional recruitment constraints.
Working With Checkoff Programs
If you're a commodity board or checkoff program exploring marketing and research partnerships, consider:
Research Capabilities
Does your agency partner conduct its own research, or rely on third-party data? Proprietary research capabilities—especially approaches that can deliver insight quickly—provide strategic advantage.
Category Expertise
Agricultural marketing requires understanding seasonal dynamics, regulatory considerations, trade policy implications, and producer concerns. General-market agencies often lack this context.
Measurement Rigor
Checkoff programs face accountability requirements. Partners should demonstrate how programs drive measurable outcomes—not just impressions but behavior change.
International Experience
If export promotion matters, ensure partners understand international markets. Consumer research in Tokyo differs from research in Toronto.
The Future of Checkoff Programs
Checkoff programs face evolving challenges:
-
•
Changing consumer values: Sustainability, animal welfare, and local sourcing reshape demand
-
•
Protein competition: Plant-based alternatives and emerging proteins compete for consumer attention
-
•
Digital disruption: Media fragmentation makes reaching consumers more complex
-
•
Generational shift: Younger consumers engage with food differently than their parents
-
•
Trade uncertainty: Policy shifts affect export market viability
Programs that invest in continuous consumer intelligence—understanding how markets are shifting, not just how they looked last year—will navigate these challenges more effectively.
Key Takeaways
-
•
Checkoff programs are producer-funded marketing initiatives that pool resources for collective commodity promotion
-
•
Assessments are collected at point of sale and managed by producer-elected boards under USDA oversight
-
•
Funds support marketing, research, export promotion, and industry education
-
•
ROI studies generally show positive returns, though methodology debates continue
-
•
Programs have evolved from simple advertising to sophisticated, research-driven strategies
-
•
Consumer research is increasingly central to effective checkoff programming
-
•
The future demands agility—programs need real-time insight to navigate rapidly changing markets
Learn More
6 Seeds Consulting specializes in consumer research for commodity boards and agricultural organizations. Our AI-powered digital twin methodology delivers consumer insight in days rather than months—helping checkoff programs understand their markets and measure their impact.
Learn about our research approach | Contact us
Related reading:
-
•
[Top Agricultural Marketing Agencies in North America [2026]](/insights/top-agricultural-marketing-agencies-2026)
-
•
How Commodity Boards Use Consumer Research to Drive Demand (coming soon)
