The room was tired.
Two senior staffers from a commodity board had landed in our office with a familiar problem: a thick binder containing last year's "definitive" market report, a trade mission in six weeks, and a blunt question from their chair: What's actually changed in our priority markets since this was published?
Everyone looked at the PDF. Then at each other.
The fieldwork that fed that report had been conducted nine months earlier, in two cities, with an overworked local panel. Crude price movements, retailer resets, and new import regulations since then? Not in the deck. Meanwhile, the board needed answers—who to target, which claims would land, which pack and price would stick, how to brief buyers with confidence.
This scenario plays out across commodity boards every month. Boards are expected to make decisions on tighter timelines with higher stakes, yet the research informing those decisions often lags reality by quarters or years.
This guide explains how leading commodity boards use consumer research effectively—and how the field is evolving.
Why Commodity Boards Need Consumer Research
Commodity boards face a unique challenge: marketing products that are, by definition, undifferentiated. Beef is beef. Soybeans are soybeans. Almonds are almonds.
Without brand differentiation, commodity marketing must focus on category-level demand. That requires understanding:
-
•
Who's consuming (and who isn't): Which demographics are growing, shrinking, or shifting preferences?
-
•
What drives choice: Health perceptions? Price? Sustainability? Convenience?
-
•
Where consumption happens: Retail vs. foodservice? Which channels are growing?
-
•
How to reach consumers: Which messages resonate? Which fall flat?
Consumer research answers these questions. Without it, commodity boards are spending checkoff dollars on guesswork.
The Traditional Approach (And Its Limitations)
Most commodity boards rely on traditional research methods:
Surveys
Structured questionnaires administered to panels of respondents. Useful for quantifying attitudes and tracking trends over time.
Limitations:
-
•
Respondents often say what they think researchers want to hear
-
•
The gap between stated preference and actual behavior (the "say-do gap") undermines reliability
-
•
Panel quality varies; some respondents are over-surveyed and disengaged
-
•
Fielding takes weeks; results arrive after market conditions have shifted
Focus Groups
Small-group discussions exploring attitudes, perceptions, and reactions in depth.
Limitations:
-
•
Small sample sizes limit generalizability
-
•
Group dynamics skew responses (dominant voices, social conformity)
-
•
Expensive to conduct, especially in multiple markets
-
•
Qualitative insight without quantitative validation
Syndicated Data
Purchased data from research providers (Nielsen, IRI, Mintel) tracking sales, consumption, and trends.
Limitations:
-
•
Backward-looking; shows what happened, not why
-
•
Generic categories may not match commodity-specific needs
-
•
Expensive subscriptions strain checkoff budgets
-
•
Often lacks the granularity commodity boards need
In-Market Observation
Retail audits, menu monitoring, and field visits to understand market conditions.
Limitations:
-
•
Time-intensive and difficult to scale
-
•
Snapshot observations may not represent broader patterns
-
•
Hard to conduct systematically across international markets
The Say-Do Gap: Why Stated Preference Misleads
The most significant limitation of traditional research is the say-do gap—the disconnect between what consumers claim and how they behave.
Ask consumers if they care about sustainability. Most will say yes. Watch what they actually buy, and the picture changes. Price, convenience, and habit often override stated values.
Ask consumers if they'd pay more for locally sourced products. Many will say yes. Observe checkout behavior, and premium products often stay on shelves.
This isn't because consumers lie. They're predicting future behavior based on current intentions—and humans are notoriously bad at that. We overestimate our willingness to pay. We underestimate the power of habit. We tell researchers what we think we should want.
For commodity boards, the say-do gap creates real risk. Campaigns built on stated preferences may miss the behavioral triggers that actually drive purchase. Research that captures only the "say" layer produces confident strategies that fail in market.
Effective consumer research must capture both layers—what consumers articulate and what they do.
What Leading Commodity Boards Get Right
Boards that use research effectively share common practices:
1. Research Before Strategy, Not After
Too often, research is used to validate decisions already made. The board wants to launch a sustainability campaign, so research is commissioned to confirm consumers care about sustainability.
Leading boards flip this sequence. Research informs strategy development, revealing opportunities the board hadn't considered and closing doors on ideas that seem appealing but lack market support.
2. Continuous Intelligence, Not Periodic Studies
Markets move faster than annual research cycles. Consumer preferences shift. Competitors act. Regulations change. Trade dynamics evolve.
Leading boards invest in continuous intelligence—ongoing tracking that surfaces changes as they happen, not in next year's report. This might mean quarterly pulse surveys, real-time social listening, or always-on synthetic research capabilities.
3. Behavioral Data, Not Just Attitudinal
Attitudes predict behavior poorly. Purchase data, consumption occasions, and observed behavior reveal what consumers actually do.
Leading boards triangulate: attitudinal research to understand the "why," behavioral data to ground-truth the "what." When attitudes and behaviors diverge, behavior wins.
4. Segmentation That Drives Action
Generic demographic segments (millennials, boomers, urban, rural) rarely drive actionable strategy. Everyone knows millennials matter. The question is which millennials, for what occasions, with what messages.
Leading boards build behavioral segments based on consumption patterns, purchase drivers, and responsiveness to messaging. These segments translate directly to targeting strategy.
5. International Market Understanding
For export-focused commodities, domestic research doesn't translate. Consumer behavior in Seoul differs from behavior in Seattle. Cultural context, competitive sets, and channel dynamics vary by market.
Leading boards invest in market-specific research for priority export destinations—not just translated surveys but culturally calibrated insight.
How Consumer Research Informs Checkoff Investments
Research should connect directly to investment decisions:
Campaign Development
Which messages resonate with target segments? Research tests claims, creative concepts, and positioning before production budgets are committed.
Example: A commodity board tests three positioning concepts—nutritional superiority, versatility, and sustainability. Research reveals nutrition plus versatility outperforms standalone sustainability messaging. The campaign is built accordingly.
Channel Strategy
Where should marketing dollars focus—retail or foodservice? Which retail banners? Which foodservice segments?
Example: Research shows that growth for a commodity is concentrated in fast-casual foodservice, while retail consumption is flat. The board shifts investment toward chef and operator outreach.
Price and Pack Architecture
What price points are acceptable? Which pack sizes reduce waste and fit consumer needs?
Example: Export market research reveals that existing pack sizes create kitchen waste in target restaurants. A new format is developed specifically for that market.
Trade Mission Preparation
What do buyers in target markets need to hear? What objections will they raise? What evidence will persuade them?
Example: Before a trade mission to Southeast Asia, research identifies specific claims that move chef interest and objections likely to arise. The delegation arrives prepared.
Crisis Response
When issues emerge—food safety concerns, negative press, activist campaigns—research helps boards understand consumer perception and craft effective responses.
Example: Negative coverage creates concern about a commodity's environmental impact. Research reveals that consumers are aware of the coverage but that purchase behavior hasn't changed. The board responds proportionally rather than over-reacting.
The Evolution: AI-Powered Consumer Research
Traditional research faces a fundamental tension: rigor versus speed. Comprehensive studies take months and cost heavily. Fast insight often sacrifices depth.
AI-powered approaches are changing this equation.
Synthetic Research and Digital Twins
Synthetic research uses AI to simulate consumer populations. Instead of recruiting respondents, researchers build "digital twins"—AI-powered personas calibrated to match real demographic, psychographic, and behavioral distributions.
These synthetic cohorts can be queried like traditional panels but respond in hours rather than weeks. Calibration against known data (census figures, consumption patterns, past research) ensures outputs reflect population reality, not AI hallucination.
What Synthetic Research Enables
-
•
Speed: Answers in days, not months
-
•
Scale: Large sample sizes without recruitment constraints
-
•
Iteration: Test multiple concepts quickly, refine, retest
-
•
Access: Reach populations that are hard to recruit (international consumers, niche demographics)
-
•
Cost efficiency: More insight for the same budget
What Synthetic Research Doesn't Replace
-
•
Sensory research requiring actual product trial
-
•
Deep ethnographic observation
-
•
Legal and regulatory verification
-
•
Relationship-building that comes from in-market presence
The point isn't replacing human insight. It's sending teams into market sharper, sooner, and with fewer blind spots.
From Insight to Action: A Framework
Research only matters if it changes decisions. A framework for turning insight into action:
Reveal
Uncover the gap between what consumers say and what they do. Map the market: who buys, how they buy, what they pay, what they believe.
Reimagine
Pressure-test strategy against research. Claims, creative, channel sequencing, pack and price—rapidly tested, ranked, and localized. Kill ideas that don't survive contact with consumer reality.
Realize
Turn insight into action. Trade decks, message toolkits, buyer FAQs, and a standing capability to ask the market as new questions arise.
The goal is closing the loop between research and execution—not a binder that sits on a shelf but intelligence that shapes every decision.
Questions to Ask Your Research Partners
If you're a commodity board evaluating research capabilities, consider:
-
•
Do they conduct their own research, or aggregate third-party data? Proprietary methodology matters.
-
•
How fast can they deliver? If the answer is months, you're getting last quarter's insight for next quarter's decisions.
-
•
How do they handle the say-do gap? If they only measure stated preference, you're getting half the picture.
-
•
Can they reach your priority markets? International research requires more than translated questionnaires.
-
•
How does research connect to action? Insight without activation is expensive shelf decoration.
The Bottom Line
Consumer research isn't optional for commodity boards. Checkoff dollars spent without consumer insight are checkoff dollars at risk.
The question isn't whether to invest in research but how to invest effectively:
-
•
Before strategy, not after — let research inform direction
-
•
Continuously, not periodically — markets move faster than annual studies
-
•
Behaviorally, not just attitudinally — stated preference misleads
-
•
Specifically, not generically — segments should drive action
-
•
Quickly, not eventually — insight that arrives late is insight that arrives too late
The boards that build always-on intelligence capabilities—understanding how their markets are shifting in real time—will outperform those still waiting for next year's PDF.
How 6 Seeds Helps Commodity Boards
6 Seeds Consulting specializes in consumer research for commodity boards and agricultural organizations. Our AI-powered digital twin methodology delivers consumer insight in days rather than months.
We help boards:
-
•
Prepare for trade missions with current market intelligence
-
•
Test messaging and claims before campaign investment
-
•
Understand international markets without traditional fieldwork constraints
-
•
Build continuous intelligence capabilities for ongoing decision support
[
